- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:58:09 +0100
- To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
"Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it> writes:
> Henry,
>
> I believe there is a bug in clause 3.2 under "Schema Representation
> Constraint: Inclusion Constraints and Semantics". Since I am looking at the
> "W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation 18 March 2004", I assume there is no
> erratum on this.
>
> Clause 3.2 says:
>
> -------------
> [...] the schema corresponding to the <include>d item's parent <schema> must
> include not only definitions or declarations corresponding to [...]
> -------------
>
> It should say:
>
> -------------
> [...] the schema corresponding to the <include>ing item's parent <schema>
> must include not only definitions or declarations corresponding to [...]
> -------------
Yup, that looks like a typo. '<include>d item' doesn't make any
sense.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 07:58:17 UTC