- From: Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:59:09 -0400
- To: Schema Comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
It appears that the definition of the {facets} property of the
simple type definition schema component includes both the fundamental
and constraining facets, according to the definition. OTOH, since
the description talks about a possibly empty set of facets and
there is also a {fundamental facets} property which is the set of
fundamental facets, I suspect it was intended that the {facets}
property only include constraining facets.
--
Dave Peterson
SGMLWorks!
davep@iit.edu
Received on Monday, 20 September 2004 02:59:14 UTC