W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Bag Element

From: Orion Adrian <oadrian@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:38:42 -0500
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY1-F140nDsbQ25sNc0000d9ae@hotmail.com>

Actually I hadn't even really thought the bad element through.  The 
situation without it is even worse than I had previously thought because you 
have to include N factorial (N!) choice elements where N is the number of 
elements that have a minInclude of 0 and a maxInclude of 1.  I've been 
trying to create a meta library that specifies commonly used properties as 
specific elements, but there are currently 6 elements that are min=0, max=1. 
  This would require 720 different choice elements.  This is insane!  Either 
the W3C needs to abandon non-sequenced elements (as used in the HTML head 
element) or it needs to introduce an unordered group structure.


Get reliable access on MSN 9 Dial-up. 3 months for the price of 1! 
(Limited-time offer) 
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 10:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:02 UTC