- From: Hess Yvan <yvan.hess@imtf.ch>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:53:09 +0100
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
It will be great in the new specification to have a kind of bag element with the following requirements 1. The order of the elements is not important 2. It can contains predefined elements that must occurs with a given occurrences (min and max) 3. It can also accepts any king of others elements (same or others namespaces) using <xs:any> element. <xs:element name="metadata"> <xs:complexType> <xs:bag> <xs:element name="identifier" type="xs:string" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> <xs:element name="subject" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" /> <xs:element name="name" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <xs:any processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:bag> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> Here is an instance example: <metadata> <identifier>urn:hsc:1234</identifier> <name>Hess Yvan</name> <subject>this is the subject</subject> <name>Hess Yvan</name> <anyOtherElement>blabla</anyOtherElement> </metadata> With version 1.0, I tried many possible ways but I never success. I think I reach a limitation of the W3C recommendation 1.0. I used for example: <xs:element name="metadata"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="identifier" type="xs:string"/> <xs:any processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> But in this case it violates the "Unique Particle Attribution". From my point of view this use case is a real concrete use case that should be supported by W3C XML schema recommendation in a given way. Yvan Hess Chief Software Architect e-mail: yvan.hess@imtf.ch phone : +41 (0)26 460 66 66 fax : +41 (0)26 460 66 60 Informatique-MTF SA Route du Bleuet 1 CH-1762 Givisiez Systemintegrators for eDocuments http://www.imtf.com DISCLAIMER This message is intended only for use by the person to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Its content does not constitute a formal commitment by IMTF. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this message. Thank You.
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 03:59:10 UTC