RE: can an attribute prohibited by restriction be added back through a subsequent extension? from Dare Obasanjo on 2004-01-22 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from January to March 2004)

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:47:39 -0800
To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, <holstege@mathling.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D101A45AA0@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alessandro Triglia [mailto:sandro@mclink.it] 
>Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:18 AM
>To: 'Henry S. Thompson'; holstege@mathling.com
>Cc: Dare Obasanjo; xmlschema-dev@w3.org; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
>Subject: RE: can an attribute prohibited by restriction be 
>added back through a subsequent extension?
>
>> I think we should fix this one way or another -- what do you think is
>> best:
>> 
>>   1) No constraint on re-introduction;
>>   2) No re-introduction of any kind (apparent intention of current 
>> REC);
>>   3) Re-introduction of unchanged originals only (what the 
>current REC
>>      actually says)?
>
>
>I don't see any good reason for forbidding re-introduction.  

+1

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Fairy tales: horror stories for children to get them used to reality.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2004 15:47:45 UTC