www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2004 by date

Friday, 18 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: pt.0 2.2.3 apostrophes in plural Daniel Barclay

Thursday, 17 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.2 confused wording Daniel Barclay

Wednesday, 16 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.4 A and B or C ambiguous Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 D ambigous required info. items Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 5.1 inverted logic Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.3.2 unparseable wording? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.3 wording: unclear, imprecise Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 unclear what's optional Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 <include>d Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 <include>d Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2.1 unclear punctuation Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.2 clarifying "->" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 4.1 editorial Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.5 schema components info. item or property? Dave Peterson
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.6 Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.5 schema components info. item or property? Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.4 unclear punctuation Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.5 confused wording Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural Dave Peterson
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 typo, punctuation, picky grammar Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 editorial - "none" used as plural Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.15.2 child or descendant type definitions? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.6 production "S" reference Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.5 confused wording Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.11.1 editorial - various Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.4 mustFind not a decl., not defined; improve wording pattern Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.2 values not distinguished from text Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: forgot "2E PER" in subject line Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Section 3.3.3: language Henry S. Thompson
• Section 3.3.3: language Ulrich.Post@softwareag.com

Tuesday, 15 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.10.1 editorial Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.8.1 unparseable wording Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.8.1 typo Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.1 unclear wording pattern Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.6 pair canonical form undefined? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.4 typo "becauseone" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.3.2 either-or wrong, "contains" misleading Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.5 ambiguous grouping Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.2 {attr. decl.} not quite specified Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 2.2.1.2 editorial "to base type" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 2.3 editorial - commas Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 1.3 editorial "together with" not plural Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.4.1 editorial - comma Daniel Barclay
• Geschrieben von Margrit am 07. April 2004 Paul.V.Biron@kp.org

Monday, 14 June 2004

• reference to IRI-to-URI algorithm C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• XML schema draft comments: pt.1 3.2.2 Daniel Barclay

Friday, 11 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: forgot "2E PER" in subject line Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: appendix F typo "Quanitifer" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 1.5, 5 confusing missing plurals Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.3.6.1 property vs. value of property Daniel Barclay
• Re: no answers to versioning and extension Henry S. Thompson
• no answers to versioning and extension Dean Hiller

Thursday, 10 June 2004

• XML schema draft comments: Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.5.1, etc. wording pattern ambiguous, hard to follow Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.4.1 minLength on list? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.5 misaligned definition Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.4.1 ambiguous: "one", "either" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2.1 ambiguous wording Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2 typo "an partial order" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.2 circular definition? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.2.1 confused wording? Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 4.1.2.1: what if both base and simpleType? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 4.1.2.1: what if both base and simpleType? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt. 2: refer to part to doc. conventions Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.3.13 type: "0and" Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.3.7 "colonized" (clarity) Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: pt. 2 3.3.1 how to refer to excluded whitespace characters Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.18 mapping not defined Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.15.1: hexBinary example octets not clear Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 3.2.12.11: "--MM-DD" Dave Peterson

Wednesday, 9 June 2004

• Re: XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous Dave Peterson
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.12.11: "--MM-DD" Daniel Barclay
• Re: XML schema draft comments: 3.2.8 wording problem Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.8 wording problem Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: 3.2.6.1 wording problem Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: "pattern" -> "regular expression"? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: punctuation/grammatical error changing meaning Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: is list canonical form underspecified? Daniel Barclay
• XML schema draft comments: "space-separated" ambiguous Daniel Barclay

Wednesday, 2 June 2004

• Proposed erratum or addition to XML Schema 1.1: support for ignorable whitespace Norman Walsh

Thursday, 27 May 2004

• Re: two more typos in Part 2 of PER Henry S. Thompson
• Re: bracket missing in pattern for lexical space of xs:language Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 14 May 2004

• {scope} and born-binary Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 13 May 2004

• Proposed schema issue: clarify definition of "restriction" noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 11 May 2004

• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? Michael Kay
• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? Ashok Malhotra
• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? Michael Kay
• RE: Is "." a valid xs:decimal? Ashok Malhotra
• Is "." a valid xs:decimal? Michael Kay

Monday, 3 May 2004

• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER Dave Peterson
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER Ashok Malhotra
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER Dave Peterson
• RE: float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER Ashok Malhotra
• float and double bounded facet value, new 1.0 error not caught by 2E Dave Peterson
• float and double ordered facet value, error in 2E PER Dave Peterson

Sunday, 2 May 2004

• 1.0 error in bounded facet, not corrected in 2E PER Dave Peterson

Sunday, 18 April 2004

• Re: XML Schema Decimal Types Dave Peterson

Thursday, 15 April 2004

• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] jcowan@reutershealth.com
• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] Mike Cowlishaw

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

• Re: [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• [ht@inf.ed.ac.uk: Re: [xml-dev] RE: Schema vs Schema-free] jcowan@reutershealth.com
• Re: Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs? Orion Adrian
• XML Schema 2E PER review from WSDesc WG Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 8 April 2004

• [Fwd: Re: Why bother using DTDs?] Alan Plum

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

• Protest the \- change (E2-18) Bob Foster
• Comments on XML Schema: Component Designators (version of March 9 2004) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Correction Re: Using XML Schema components in application languages Simon Cox
• Using XMLSchema.xsd in application schemas Simon Cox

Monday, 5 April 2004

• Server Error (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org) mogul@pa.dec.com

Saturday, 3 April 2004

• [2E PER] Attribute Wildcards: numbering problem Michael Kay

Friday, 2 April 2004

• XML Schema PER: comments from the XKMS WG Jose Kahan
• Re: Clarify merge/union of facets Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 1 April 2004

• value of pattern facet Xan Gregg
• Clarify merge/union of facets Xan Gregg

Last message date: Wednesday, 23 June 2004 15:01:09 UTC