- From: by way of <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 06:14:44 -0700
- To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.1.20030314061434.02657dd0@localhost>
I had my wife, who spent a while in france but knows nothing about XML schemas, look at your translation. Here is an alternate translation: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hello, I am allowing myself to send you a short note about document XML Schema tome 0 : Introduction available at URL.:http: etc. In chapter 2.2 one can read as (just after the definition of the type of USAddress) “ The outcome of this definition is that every instance of this element in the instance (for example shipTo of poster po.xml) should be made up of five elements and one attribut.†And again in the same chapter 2.2 (just after the definition of the type of PurchaseOrderTyupe): “The elements shipTo and billTo can equally have the attribut of country which is part of the definiton of USAddress.†In the first case shipTo MUST have the attribut, in the second case, shpTO CAN have the attribute. There is a real difference in meaning (I am looking at the English version, and we have there the same ambiguity) Sincerely, Emmanuel Languillat
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 09:32:54 UTC