Fw: Example in E2-30 Clarification

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Xan Gregg" <xan@tibco.com>
To: <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Example in E2-30 Clarification


> 
> > Yes, either
> >   <xs:pattern value='123(\s\d+)* 456'/>
> > or
> >    <xs:pattern value='123 (\d+\s)*456'/>
> 
> I thought we had fixed that in the telcon... Looks like the amendments  
> to this erratum made during the 2002-10-25 telcon [1] didn't make it  
> into the final documents.
> 
> I got a little confused looking this up because the issues list says  
> the R-18 was approved on 2002-10-24 and R-40 was approved on  
> 2002-10-25, but it's actually vice versa.
> 
> Checking the notes on R-40, it looks like its amendments also didn't  
> make it into the final documents.  Curiously, those amendments did make  
> it into a revised posting of the erratum fix [2], which is linked from  
> the issues list.
> 
> xan
> 
> [1] Excerpt from the 2002-10-25 minutes:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0253.html
> 
> 3.4 R-18 Use of pattern facet for list type
>       http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfipattern
>        
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0234.html
> 
> AMENDMENT: s/(and hence, the value space)// (on the grounds that the
> value space is not a blank-delimited sequence of literals but a
> sequence of values).
> 
> AMENDMENT: s/whitespace separated/space-separated/
> and in para 2 of 2.5.1.2 s/white space separated/space-separated/
> and in para 2 of 2.5.1.2 delete the final parenthetical phrase.
> 
> AMENDMENT: s/dataytpe/datatype/
> 
> AMENDMENT: s/(\d+\s)* 456/(\d+ )*456/
> ...
> RESOLVED: to accept the erratum for R-18 as amended.
> 
> [2]  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0243/ 
> 01-errataR-40.html
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 18:11:47 UTC