References, [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0222.html (member only) [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-ref-20030109/#issue_derived_cm_not_ma nifest Mary and I bumped into this issue. Today, there is no mechanism to trace back the origin of some of the components that were assembled via compiling a complex/simple type definition. <quote> (5) "Inherited" portions of content model not manifest Suppose one type extends another type by adding additional terms to a sequence. In the schema component model there is no direct way to determine which terms in the sequence come from the base type: the inheritance is "compiled out" as it were. </quote> How does this issue apply to Simple Type Definition? via Simple Type Definition.{facets} property. This property is a union of the set of Facets components resolved to by the facet [children] merged with {facets} from {base type definition}, subject .. For details, please refer to [1] and [2]. Regards, AsirReceived on Thursday, 23 January 2003 14:38:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:59 UTC