W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex) (potential erratum?)

From: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:10:18 -0400
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9F57FB83.DD91AD2E-ON85256D3D.0063BC5D@torolab.ibm.com>

In the constraint "Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex)"

2.1.3 [Definition:]  Let the effective value constraint of an attribute use
be its {value constraint}, if present, otherwise its {attribute
declaration}'s {value constraint} . Then one of the following must be true: B's ·effective value constraint· is ·absent· or default. R's ·effective value constraint· is fixed with the same string as
B's. mentions "the same string as B's". Shouldn't it be either the same
"actual value" or the same "canonical representation"? (I think actual
value is more proper.)

Sandy Gao
Software Developer, IBM Canada
(1-905) 413-3255
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 14:10:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:00 UTC