E2-41, R-140, R-141, and R-195

According to the minutes of WG meetings and documents referred to therein,
the paragraph added to 3.2.7.4 (erroneously given the old number 3.2.7.3
in the erratum text) was to be in the main text of 3.2.7.

The remaining (original) text of what is now 3.2.7.4 still contains the
flaws of R-140, R-141, and R-195.  Since the above-mentioned paragraph
defines the dateTime order as precisely as the other datatypes'
descriptions, the easiest way to address R-140, R-141, and R-195 is
to simply move the new definition back to 3.2.7 as originally approved
and delete 3.2.7.4

-- 
Dave Peterson
SGMLWorks!, for IDEAlliance

davep@iit.edu

Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 11:12:41 UTC