Why did we change the type of the version attribute

• From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• Date: 30 Apr 2003 14:18:27 +0100
• To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
• Message-ID: <f5bn0i8ktss.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

With 20-20 hindsight, I cannot for the life of me reconstruct why we
adopted E1-9 [1].  Since it looks like (see two previous messages)
we're going to have to make some other last-minute fixes, let's fix
this too, i.e. roll the change back out.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata.html#e1-9
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 09:18:28 UTC