Thursday, 26 June 2003
Wednesday, 25 June 2003
Monday, 23 June 2003
Saturday, 21 June 2003
Friday, 13 June 2003
Thursday, 12 June 2003
Wednesday, 11 June 2003
- representing any obect in Schema
- XML Schema 1.1
- RE: error in 2e datatypes diagram
- RE: error in 2e datatypes diagram
- error in 2e datatypes diagram
Friday, 6 June 2003
- Typos in E2-41
- <complexContent> extending <simpleContent> (clarification/erratum?)
- Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex) (potential erratum?)
- Name and Type OK (potential erratum?)
- Re: rcaseNameAndTypeOK too restrictive about restrictions
- Whitespace and identity constraints
- Validate XML file with included XML Schema in same XML file
- Re: xml attributes
- Predefined final value for list datatypes.
- rcaseNameAndTypeOK too restrictive about restrictions
- Make xsi:type a list of QNames?
- Comments on Datatypes from ISO SC34
- XML Transformation Metadata
- Proposal: Identification domain
Thursday, 5 June 2003
Wednesday, 4 June 2003
Monday, 2 June 2003
Wednesday, 28 May 2003
Tuesday, 27 May 2003
Thursday, 15 May 2003
Monday, 12 May 2003
Thursday, 8 May 2003
Tuesday, 6 May 2003
- RE: Is there any archive or digest of the public comments to the XML Schema 1.1 working draft?
- Is there any archive or digest of the public comments to the XML Schema 1.1 working draft?
Monday, 5 May 2003
Friday, 2 May 2003
Thursday, 1 May 2003
Wednesday, 30 April 2003
- RE: Problems with Erratum E2-9 (base64Binary)
- Why did we change the type of the version attribute
- Problems with Erratum E2-9 (base64Binary)
- Re: Erratum E2-43: invalid pattern
- Re: Erratum E2-43: invalid pattern
Monday, 28 April 2003
Monday, 21 April 2003
- Re: Equality of items of different numeric types
- RE: Equality of items of different numeric types
- Re: Information is sparse on the development of XML Schema 1.1?
- Equality of items of different numeric types
- lazy attribute wildcard conflicts with restriction
Tuesday, 15 April 2003
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Sunday, 6 April 2003
- wish: Treating attributes and elements more equally
- Re: Question about VR Element Locally Valid (Element) in Structures 3.3.4