- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 04 Nov 2002 09:54:24 +0000
- To: Max Jacob <Max.Jacob@ircam.fr> (by way of "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>)
- Cc: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Max Jacob <Max.Jacob@ircam.fr> (by way of "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>) writes: > When I have a type or element declaration I'm still not able to build > an xpath to the base type declaration, because I don't know if it's a > complex or a simple type. Supposing (a _big_ supposition, see below), your schema is described by a single schema document, then why doesn't the following sketch work: xsd:complexContent/*[self::xsd:restriction or self::xsd:extension]/xsd:complexType | /xsd:schema/xsd:complexType[@name=current-node()/xsd:complexContent/*[self::xsd:restriction or self::xsd:extension]/@base] | xsd:simpleContent/*[self::xsd:restriction or self::xsd:extension]/xsd:simpleType | /xsd:schema/*[@name=current-node()/xsd:simpleContent/*[self::xsd:restriction or self::xsd:extension]/@base and (self::xsd:complexType or self::xsd:simpleType)] It has to be said that navigating schema _documents_ when what you really want is to navigate schema _components_ is a pain. The XML Schema WG is working on a story about Schema Component Designators, to address this problem. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 04:54:27 UTC