- From: John Harding <john.harding@comtec-europe.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:28:38 -0700
- To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
The handling of null values with nillable is crufty. If a value is null then allow it to be so without including atrtibutes in the xml to say that "this value is null". It may be complete but in reality would never be used. I've had to work around this by creating my own types such as nullableLong and nullableDate via unions. Perhaps use a lax mode for nulls where you can have null values without any extra attriubutes being included in the eleme > ==================================== > John Harding > Senior Developer > Comtec (Europe) Ltd > ==================================== > t: +44 (0)1633 627500 ex509 > f: +44 (0)1633 627501 > e: john.harding@comtec-europe.co.uk > > <http://www.comtec-europe.co.uk> > > 6th Floor Gwent House, Gwent Square > Cwmbran, South Wales, NP44 1PL > ==================================== > ************************************************************************ This e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended solely for the addressee. They may contain information which is covered by legal, professional or other privilege. If you are not the intended addressee, you must not copy the e-mail or the attachments, or use them for any purpose or disclose their contents to any other person. To do so may be unlawful. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us as soon as possible and delete the message and attachments from all places in your computer where they are stored. Although we have scanned this e-mail and any attachments for viruses, it is your responsibility to ensure that they are actually virus free.
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 15:34:56 UTC