www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2002 by date

Tuesday, 1 October 2002

• How do I make entity references Michael Nielsen (Info)

Friday, 27 September 2002

• DTD Element name not known Cecilia Crasto

Wednesday, 25 September 2002

• Status of XML Schema Formal Descrition Matthias Ferdinand

Tuesday, 24 September 2002

• need help with a schema -- 'all' group by way of
• Dear tmichel , Is your email list too small? tmichel

Monday, 23 September 2002

• Re: [Moderator Action] Unique Particle Attribution and ECMA's CSTA phase 3 XML Schema Eddie Robertsson
• Unique Particle Attribution and ECMA's CSTA phase 3 XML Schema Maggiulli, Patrick G (Patrick)
• Re: [Moderator Action] Unique Particle Attribution and ECMA's CSTA phase 3 XML Schema C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Friday, 20 September 2002

• ���ڹ���8000������ʼ���ַ�Ĵ� very@w3.org

Thursday, 19 September 2002

• RE: Question: validity of type overide with union type Biron,Paul V

Tuesday, 17 September 2002

• RE: What is the canonical lexical representation of duration? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Henry S. Thompson
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Henry S. Thompson
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Henry S. Thompson
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Jeni Tennison
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 16 September 2002

• Possibility to define a data type for element that are mixed by way of
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Jeni Tennison
• Re: R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 15 September 2002

• R-117: pfianyTypeLax: Problem with processContents for the ur-type Jeni Tennison

Friday, 13 September 2002

• Re: xsi:schemaVersion Dan Chang
• Re: xsi:schemaVersion noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• xsi:schemaVersion Dan Chang

Saturday, 7 September 2002

• Re: PSVI: {document} property Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 6 September 2002

• Typed "href" and traversal across "href" Ricky Ho
• Input from Digitect B.V. Netherlands to the W3C XML Schema version 1.1 Development Frans van Basten - Digitect

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• Re: PSVI: {document} property noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: PSVI: {document} property Henry S. Thompson
• Re: PSVI: {document} property Elena Litani
• Re: PSVI: {document} property Henry S. Thompson
• Re: PSVI: {document} property Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 4 September 2002

• RE: PSVI: {document} property Biron,Paul V
• PSVI: {document} property Elena Litani

Tuesday, 3 September 2002

• faster code writing by way of
• RE: delimiter for list items by way of
• Types date, time and dateTime. Roberto Hideki
• What is the canonical lexical representation of duration? by way of

Saturday, 31 August 2002

• [광고] www-xml-schema-comments님 안녕하십니까? LA

Thursday, 29 August 2002

• Re: Question on use="required" Jeni Tennison
• Re: Question on use="required" Stanley Guan
• Re: The errata document is empty for some browsers Henry S. Thompson
• Re: The errata document is empty for some browsers Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: The errata document is empty for some browsers Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Question on use="required" Jeni Tennison
• SUPER SALE ACTION! supersale@hotmail.com
• RE: Question on use="required" Dare Obasanjo

Tuesday, 27 August 2002

• XML attributes Shahrzad Molavi
• Extending with mixed content Eric Jain
• The errata document is empty for some browsers Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Re: questions viz. when fields match element with the ur-type Henry S. Thompson
• 手錶也可以換現金哦~ time@w3.org

Monday, 26 August 2002

• Re: redundant mixed="true" required? Henry S. Thompson

Saturday, 24 August 2002

• Attn: PROTECT YOURSELF AGAINST HARMFUL VIRUSES! HUCXACD hk3d@hotmail.com

Friday, 23 August 2002

• questions viz. when fields match element with the ur-type neilg@ca.ibm.com

Thursday, 22 August 2002

• RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? Biron,Paul V
• Re: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 21 August 2002

• OAGI Comments/Questions/Suggestions Regarding XML Schema Rec, 1.1 and beyond Mark Feblowitz
• RE: delimiter for list items Ashok Malhotra

Tuesday, 20 August 2002

• Validating xml using a schema with domparser does not work by way of

Monday, 19 August 2002

• RE: delimiter for list items by way of
• Re: XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 16 August 2002

• Re: XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet Brown, Lee
• RE: delimiter for list items Biron,Paul V
• Re: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Should this schema be invalid? Henry S. Thompson
• XSchema Validation by way of
• block attribute for simple types by way of
• complexTypes, attributes, and enumerations MALIK, NAUMAN
• delimiter for list items by way of
• ID attribute by way of
• Inlined simle type in complex restriction derivation with simple content by way of

Thursday, 15 August 2002

• RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? Dan Connolly

Sunday, 11 August 2002

• Re: Candidate Requirement for XML Schema 1.1 Jonathan Robie

Saturday, 10 August 2002

• Re: Candidate Requirement for XML Schema 1.1 Dave Peterson

Thursday, 8 August 2002

• Candidate Requirement for XML Schema 1.1 Jonathan Robie

Friday, 9 August 2002

• RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Regular expressions noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 7 August 2002

• Re: a comment concerning the scema primer... Priscilla Walmsley

Sunday, 4 August 2002

• 求職不如創業...賺錢要有新觀念...祥看內容您會有不同的收穫 chaien@w3.org
• 求職不如創業...賺錢要有新觀念...祥看內容您會有不同的收穫 chaien@w3.org

Friday, 2 August 2002

• RE: QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? Ashok Malhotra
• MSXML and Schema by way of
• QName is ambiguous; aren't datatypes unambiguous? union types total? Dan Connolly

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• Re: Should this schema be invalid? Jeni Tennison
• RE: Should this schema be invalid? Dare Obasanjo

Wednesday, 31 July 2002

• RE: Public comment on XML Schemas Ashok Malhotra

Tuesday, 30 July 2002

• Public comment on XML Schemas Patrick McCartney

Monday, 29 July 2002

• Regular expressions by way of
• Help !!! by way of
• "make whatever improvements we can, consistent with the constraints on scope and compatibility" Dave Yost
• a comment concerning the scema primer... Bruno Boettcher

Sunday, 28 July 2002

• Bigger Pants TheBigOne

Saturday, 13 July 2002

• Make Big Money with eBay and . . . 11559 cristyle@hotmail.com

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• RE: normalizedString and its subtypes Kay, Michael

Wednesday, 24 July 2002

• OWN COMPUTER - PUT IT ON WOR uri

Monday, 22 July 2002

• ��ҵ�������Ϣ Re@w3.org

Friday, 19 July 2002

• RE: Number of namespaces are supported by a schema? Biron,Paul V
• SOS: Number of namespaces are supported by a schema? Teresa Pereira
• RE: QName data type: default namespace Kay, Michael

Thursday, 18 July 2002

• RE: normalizedString and its subtypes Kay, Michael
• Re: QName data type: default namespace Henry S. Thompson
• RE: QName data type: default namespace Kay, Michael
• Re: normalizedString and its subtypes Henry S. Thompson
• Lengthy follow-up on XPointer and XML Schema Henry S. Thompson
• Re: QName data type: default namespace Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 17 July 2002

• Re: [xml-dev] XPointer and XML Schema Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [xml-dev] XPointer and XML Schema Eric van der Vlist
• Re: [xml-dev] XPointer and XML Schema Henry S. Thompson
• QName data type: default namespace Kay, Michael

Tuesday, 16 July 2002

• RE: Two questions on Regex's Biron,Paul V
• Re: normalizedString and its subtypes Henry S. Thompson
• Two questions on Regex's Ashok Malhotra
• normalizedString and its subtypes Kay, Michael

Monday, 15 July 2002

• [Inadvertant/misdirected post - removed upon request of Domain Leader - cmsmcq at w3.org] Asir S Vedamuthu
• Fixed value constraint on element Richard Tobin

Friday, 12 July 2002

• type-(derivation-)based identity constraints Erik Wilde

Thursday, 11 July 2002

• RE: inconsistent use of "derived" Ashok Malhotra

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• XInterfaces - A new schema language for XML by way of
• Re: some inconsistencies David Stephenson
• Re: Nillable seems inconsistent by way of
• Nillable seems inconsistent by way of
• inheritance xml schema Nathalia Devina Widjaja
• Dependencies are needed by way of
• Canonical, Lexical, and Value Spaces Matthew Fuchs
• inconsistent use of "derived" Berthold Daum
• RE: What good is Restriction? Mark Feblowitz

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• RE: Can I choose one simpleType in one element? Kasahara, Miki

Monday, 8 July 2002

• RE: Can I choose one simpleType in one element? Biron,Paul V
• Can I choose one simpleType in one element? Kasahara, Miki
• Allow xsd:choice element to specify choices among attributes... by way of
• More Online Auction Secrets 19617 cristyjean@hotmail.com

Thursday, 4 July 2002

• RE: Representing NOTATIONs in XML Schema? Biron,Paul V

Tuesday, 2 July 2002

• Fashion Handbags and Hair accessories Factory direct on line
• [schema error code] not set Richard Tobin
• RE: skip and xsi:type Ashok Malhotra
• Can [validation attempted] ever be none for an attribute? Richard Tobin
• skip and xsi:type Richard Tobin
• Re: Feature request - anonymous simplecontent type definition within complex type definition Henry S. Thompson
• Re: treating wildcard transitions as opaque Henry S. Thompson

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 21:40:23 UTC