- From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:26:57 -0400
- To: "Lee Humphries \(by way of \"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen\" <cmsmcq@acm.org>\)" <Lee_Humphries@softworks.com.au>, "W3C XML Schema Comments list" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Lee, I do not understand your suggestion. May I request you to elaborate with one or two examples? Asir -----Original Message----- From: www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lee Humphries (by way of "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>) Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:18 AM To: W3C XML Schema Comments list Subject: XML Schema 1.1 suggestion - allow defining of namespaces for named elements or attributes At the moment only the 'any' allows for its namespace to be defined. This is a real pain in the neck when you can name the element (or attribute) but you need to define it as existing in a different namespace. Adding the 'any' namespace declaration to 'element' and 'attribute' would go a long way to enabling full cross-namespace validation. Lee Humphries SOFTWORKS Australia email: Lee_Humphries@softworks.com.au
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 12:22:48 UTC