- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:29:09 -0700
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Henry:
I'm lost! What is this in response to?
I worry about putting details of working with anySimpleType in the
structures spec when the datatypes spec says nothing about
anySimpleType. This needs to be fixed.
All the best, Ashok
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:27 AM
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Subject: facets/derivations from anySimpleType
There's a comment in the non-normative section 3.14.1 saying it
shouldn't be named as a base type in a user definition.
This is certainly wrong on one count -- it rules out defining a
user-named
synonym for anySimpleType, which should be OK.
It's probably wrong on another count -- both whiteSpace and pattern
facets make sense as restrictions on aST, and the sForS actually gives
whiteSpace facet values in all its pseudo-definitions of the builtin
in primitives.
So I think the comment should be changed to point out instead that only
those facets make sense, and a normative prohibition of any others
should be added to part 2.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is
forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 10:29:40 UTC