- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 15:05:11 +0100
- To: <jjc@incusdata.com>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacqui Coosner" <jjc@incusdata.com> To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:00 PM Subject: Nillable or nullable? > I notice that the new Schema Recommendation uses > the term "nillable" as an attribute for use on elements > which are permitted not to have comment. In the > previous Candidate Recommendation dated 24 Oct 2000, > the term used was "nullable" - which is what the tool I > use currently supports. > Is the new term a conscious change from the earlier > one, or was one of them a typo? Conscious change to nillable Regards Martin
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2001 10:07:16 UTC