- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:21:45 -0700
- To: "'Graham Klyne'" <GK@NineByNine.org>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Graham Klyne [SMTP:GK@NineByNine.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:54 AM > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > Subject: XMLSchema-2 (datatypes) namespaces > > I note that http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ indicates no less than > *three* different URI forms that might be applicable: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema#... (section 3) > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#... (section 3.1, schema) > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes#... (section 3.1) > Thank you for catching that. The namespace name http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema was in error. The other two are correct. > Then there's appendix A, which is somewhat schizophrenic about whether or > not it is normative (the heading say it is, the schema comments say it > isn't.) > Thank you again...that was an editing error, the comment was supposed to be removed from Appendix A. pvb
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 20:26:41 UTC