- From: Holger Meuss <meuss@cis.uni-muenchen.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:24:12 +0200
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc: meuss@loihi.cis.uni-muenchen.de
Hello, I think the general opinion is that XML Schema can represent context free grammars, but no context sensitive grammars. I think that XML Schema **can** represent context sensitive grammars. by means of local element declarations? Would you please correct if I'm wrong after considering the following example: Schema: *********************************************************** <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <schema> <element name="A"> <complexType> <element name="C" type="string"/> </complexType> </element> <element name="B"> <complexType> <element name="C" type="integer"/> </complexType> </element> </schema> Instances: *********************************************************** The following instance is valid: <A xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="kontextSensitiv.xsd"> <C> abc </C> </A> whereas <B xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="kontextSensitiv.xsd"> <C> abc </C> </B> is not valid. The reason for this is an explanation in Section 2.2.3 of the Primer: "If the two things are elements within different types (i.e. not global elements), say I declare one element called name as part of the USAddress type and a second element called name as part of the Item type, there is no conflict. (Such elements are sometimes called local element declarations.)" Yours, Holger
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 11:24:23 UTC