- From: R. Mark Volkmann <mark.volkmann@home.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:51:49 -0500
- To: "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@agedwards.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> To: "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@agedwards.com> Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>; <mark.volkmann@home.com> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 4:12 PM Subject: Re: attribute definitions inside xsd:restriction? > "Volkmann, Mark" <Mark.Volkmann@agedwards.com> writes: > > <snip/> > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema" > > elementFormDefault="qualified"> > > <xsd:element name="root"> > > <xsd:complexType> > > <xsd:simpleContent> > > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> > > <xsd:attribute name="attr" type="xsd:string" use="required"/> > > </xsd:restriction> > > </xsd:simpleContent> > > </xsd:complexType> > > </xsd:element> > > </xsd:schema> > > > > Why should the attribute now be defined inside <xsd:restriction> > > which defines the content? I think <xsd:attribute> should still be > > a child of <xsd:complexType>. > > The above is actually broken -- you must _extend_ string with > attributes. The following is the correct definition > > > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema" > > elementFormDefault="qualified"> > > <xsd:element name="root"> > > <xsd:complexType> > > <xsd:simpleContent> > > <xsd:extension base="xsd:string"> > > <xsd:attribute name="attr" type="xsd:string" use="required"/> > > </xsd:extension> > > </xsd:simpleContent> > > </xsd:complexType> > > </xsd:element> > > </xsd:schema> This still has the issue that the attribute "attr" is defined inside <xsd:simpleContent> even though the attribute belongs to the element "root", not to its content.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 19:51:13 UTC