- From: Gignac Donald A CRBE <GignacDA@nswccd.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:29:43 -0400
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "Westbrook Evelyn L (Lori) CRBE" <WestbrookEL@nswccd.navy.mil>, Junod L J II CRBE <JunodLJ@nswccd.navy.mil>
Section 2.3.2 "Union Types" of the Schema Primer (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#InlineTypDefn) provides the following "zips" examples <zips>CA</zips> <zips>95630 95977 95945</zips> <zips>AK</zips> I recommend that the examples be evenly spaced, i.e., <zips>CA</zips> <zips>95630 95977 95945</zips> <zips>AK</zips> to avoid confusion. Moreover I suggest that additional "zips" examples such as <zips>CA 95630</zips> <zips>95630 95977 AK 95945</zips> be provided to indicate the scope of a union. Donald Gignac 301-227-3348 "gignacda@nswccd.navy.mil"
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2001 10:30:40 UTC