- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:05:44 -0600
- To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Dear Paul: The W3C XML Schema Working Group has spent the last several months working through the comments received from the public on the last-call draft of the XML Schema specification. We thank you for the comments made by the XML Query WG on our specification during our last-call comment period, and want to make sure you know that all comments received during the last-call comment period have been recorded in our last-call issues list (http://www.w3.org/2000/05/12-xml-schema-lcissues). Among other issues, the Query WG raised the point registered as issue LC-202, which suggests that the post-schema-validation information set provide optional properties for the 'internal' physical representation of (simple) data types. After consideration, the Schema WG came to the conclusion that this topic is out of scope for XML Schema, and accordingly we will not be providing the properties in question as part of the definition of the post-schema-validation infoset. Schema is defined as a mapping from an input information set to an output information set, and information sets are intentionally situated at a level of abstraction at which implementation details like the binary representation of integers are out of scope. Some WG members believe that specs which define an API (e.g. the DOM) might appropriate discuss such properties. Other WG members believe that discussion of physical representations is or should be out of scope even for the DOM. It would be helpful to us to know whether you are satisfied with the decision taken by the WG on this issue, or wish your dissent from the WG's decision to be recorded for consideration by the Director. With best wishes, - C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Dave Hollander Co-chairs, W3C XML Schema WG
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2000 08:52:32 UTC