- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 09:34:23 -0400
- To: Michael Hübner <Michael.Huebner@gft-systems.de>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Michael Hübner writes: >> Wasn't it a design goal to allow >> all XML Schema definitions to be >> translated to (less restrictive) DTD definitions? The simple answer is no: it is a goal of schemas to provide significantly greater richness than DTDs (see the schema workgroup requirements document[1]). Unless I'm missing something, it so happens that the particular schema you give does correspond to a simple DTD, except that DTD's cannot capture the naming of what we call complex types as distinct from what XML 1.0 calls element types (which correspond to "element declarations" in schemas). On the other hand, and consistent with our requirements, schemas can express many important constructions, such as direct validation of namespace qualified content, certain kinds of inheritance relationships, etc., which can be modeled weakly if at all in a DTD. When using such features, it is in general impossible to write a DTD that accepts exactly the same documents, or that captures the same structural relationships among the declarations (e.g. substitutability of types.) Of course, there are also cases in which you can write a "loose" DTD, which accepts the same documents as a schema, but fails to reject some that should be rejected. In other words, it supports partial validation. Your confusion may arise from the fact that we have intended to meet the inverse requirement, I.e. that every DTD be translateable into a corresponding schema. For the most part we have done so, but due to limitations in the flexibility of XML 1.0 itself, it has proven impossible to reimplement certain aspects of entities --- essentially, XML 1.0 defines them as DTD mechanisms, and relates them very closely to the notion of well formedness. Schemas do model most uses of parameter entities. I hope this is helpful. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/NOTE-xml-schema-req-19990215 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 09:36:09 UTC