- From: Philip Wadler <wadler@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:54:26 -0500
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Henry writes: > As currently spec'ed you can only nominate a global element as the > exemplar of an equivalence class, so you example is invalid to start > with. Thanks, that answers my first question (as I suspected, in the negative). But not my second, repeated here. > If it's not possible, what was the rationale for omitting it? By the way, I consider this on the critical path to getting a report out the door, in the sense that the report needs to explain rationales for this and other decisions. Cheers, -- P
Received on Friday, 18 February 2000 18:56:07 UTC