- From: David Rosenborg <david.rosenborg@omgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:10:16 +0100
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Hi, I think it would be more intuitive if you could specify an occurence of a class of elements by specifying just the allowed type, like in: <type name="Foo"> ... </type> <element name="bar"> <type> <element type="Foo"/> </type> </element> <element name="foo" type="Foo"/> <element name="baz" type="Foo"/> In this (experimental) example both foo and baz would be allowed as a child to bar. Why do we need equivalence classes to accomplish this? To me they just add an unnecessary level of abstraction. What am I missing? Cheers David Rosenborg OM Technology AB
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2000 12:10:14 UTC