- From: Steve Slatcher <Steve_Slatcher@scientia.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:10:22 -0000
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
XML Schema Part2: Datatypes, 17th December 1999: It seems the draft attempts to follow ISO 8601, whilst simultaneously trying to extend aspects of it and add semantics. My general feeling is that the proposals are overambitious, taking them far beyond what is required of a simple type system. I think the purpose of the datatypes in this document should be to help the construction of correct applications by limiting flexibility. I would suggest that there should be 3 date and time types: dateTime (CCCYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss,sss+hh:mm), date (CCCYY-MM-DD), and time (hh:mm:ss,sss). ISO 8601 reduced precision (truncation from right) is OK for the date and time types only. ISO 8601 truncation is not. For the duration type, I would go away from ISO 8601 somewhat. Use lower case characters for hours, minutes and seconds (to disambiguate minutes and months), and get rid of the unneeded "P" and "T". I see no problem with using zeros (implied in some examples in the current draft), or omitting units. Just require that the units come in the right order. Specific problems, which you may want to address whether or not you accept these proposals, are outlined below. 3.2.7.1 = Presumably the first example should read P1Y2M3DT10H30M (i.e. the P is omitted in the example). 3.2.7.1 = From the examples it seems like both left and right truncation is OK, though only right truncation is mentioned in the text. Allowing both left and right truncation simultaneously seems to cause ambiguity. Is P1347M months or minutes? Perhaps it should be PT1347M for minutes? In which case this should be made clear. I note that ISO 8601 does not mention truncated representations of durations at all, though they are clearly useful. 3.2.8.1 = ISO 8601 truncation is not quite as simple as 'Every two character "unit" of the representation that is omitted is indicated by a simple hyphen"-"'. The truncated, extended, reduced precision format for the date I am writing this is 00-01-11. 3.3.18 = It is stated that a date represents a specific 24 hr period, but it has a basetype of recurringInstant. Clearly there is a conflict here. 3.3.18 = See above for my comment on hyphen truncation. 3.3.18 = The fifth day of every month example is incorrect. It was OK until you adopted the extended format which has additional hyphens. ISO 8601 says the extended format is "Not applicable" in this situation. 3.3.18 = Seems strange that Y10K is addressed here but not elsewhere. Adds further complications to left truncation using hyphens. 3.3.19.1 = Presumably truncated times, and times of reduced precision are acceptable too, though this is not stated. 3.3.18 and 3.3.19 = I do not think is is helpful to view dates and times as subtypes of recurring instances. Many sections throughout = "Accommodation" not "accomodation" (even in the US!) === Steve Slatcher
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2000 10:10:36 UTC