- From: Arnold, Curt <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:12:02 -0700
- To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'xml-dev@ic.ac.uk'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>, "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Henry S. Thompson wrote >>For the time being, the only schema-valid way to introduce an >>attribute from other than the namespace partition scoped to the >>containing element is by way of an attribute GROUP from another >>namespace, e.g. >> >> <type> >> . . . >> <attributeGroup ref='foo:baz'/> >> </type> In the Dec draft, doesn't <type> ... <anyAttribute>http://www.foo.com/namespace/foo<anyAttribute> </type> introduce attributes from other than the namespace partition scoped to the containing element? Are you saying that <anyAttribute> has been removed from subsequent WG documents and the point is moot. Another alternative would be to provide some indication that one attribute group is the namespace scope attribute pool. But you could not depending on just finding "baz" in a top level attribute group since it could appear in multiple top-level attribute groups.
Received on Friday, 7 January 2000 10:14:36 UTC