- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 17:53:07 +0100
- To: XML List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, xml-schema-comments <www-xml-schema-comments@w3c.org>
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > [...] > > We don't yet have a concrete syntax for indicating an association > between "no namespace" and a schema in xsi:schemaLocation. Wait. Is this really saying that one is looking for a way to encode the specification, that a symbol, so encoded as to denote that it is in no namespace, is really to be taken to be identical with another symbol, so encoded as to denote that it is in another, definite namespace? Isn't this impossible by definition? > need to fill this gap. The locally-scoped element declaration issue > doesn't arise in this case, or rather both interpretations give the > same answer.
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2000 11:48:59 UTC