Friday, 31 March 2000
Wednesday, 29 March 2000
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
Monday, 27 March 2000
Sunday, 26 March 2000
Friday, 24 March 2000
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
Tuesday, 21 March 2000
Monday, 20 March 2000
- Re: Use of namespaces in an XML Schema
- Use of namespaces in an XML Schema
- c14n messes up qnames in attribute values
- restriction
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
Saturday, 18 March 2000
Friday, 17 March 2000
- Help with Groups
- Re: Schema Information Set Contribution: Identity-constraint Table
- Re: XML Schema 2/25/00 WD Validator
- XML Schema 2/25/00 WD Validator
Thursday, 16 March 2000
Wednesday, 15 March 2000
- Schema Information Set Contribution: Identity-constraint Table
- Re: Parametric minOccurs, maxOccurs?
- Parametric minOccurs, maxOccurs?
Monday, 13 March 2000
- Email Advertising Works for You--We Guarantee Response!!!
- Re: Anti-Ranti
- Re: entities in XML Schema
- Re: Anti-Ranti
Saturday, 11 March 2000
- Re: Multiple inheritance again
- Re: XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet
- Re: XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet
Friday, 10 March 2000
- Re: xml schema
- xml schema
- RE: 25 Feb Structures Questions/Restriction
- Re: Question on Data types
- Re: Schema Question: Attributes
- XML Schema Part 2
- XML Schema Datatypes comments
Thursday, 9 March 2000
Wednesday, 8 March 2000
- RE: conjunction types
- Bug in Public schema for datatypes, replacement publicly available
- Re: Error in the schema for schemas ?
- Re: A "unordered" compositor ?
- Re: Local element symbol space breaks with XML 1.0?
- Re: conjunction types
- Re: include vs. import
- Error in the schema for schemas ?
- A "unordered" compositor ?
Tuesday, 7 March 2000
- Optional elements in all groups
- DTD or Schema APIs
- Re: Derivation by restriction in XML Schema
- RE: Derivation by restriction in XML Schema
Monday, 6 March 2000
- Re: Derivation by restriction in XML Schema
- Re: Comments onModel Group
- Derivation by restriction in XML Schema
- Comments onModel Group
- several questions
- Re: XML Schema question: grouping attributes
Sunday, 5 March 2000
Friday, 3 March 2000
- typo in Schema Datatypes draft
- Re: 25 Feb Structures Questions
- conjunction types
- Question on Data types
- Local element symbol space breaks with XML 1.0?
Thursday, 2 March 2000
- Re: Multiple inheritance
- Re: schema+xml examples
- Re: 25 Feb Structures Comments
- Multiple inheritance
Wednesday, 1 March 2000
- Re: 25 Feb Datatype comments
- Re: relationship between local and inherited elements
- schema+xml examples
Tuesday, 29 February 2000
Friday, 25 February 2000
- Re: relationship between local and inherited elements
- Re: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
- RE: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
Thursday, 24 February 2000
- Re: xpeak: was Floating point from left field
- Re: XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
- XML Schemas: lost "open content models"?
- Re: Schema components and namespaces
- Schema components and namespaces
Tuesday, 22 February 2000
- relationship between local and inherited elements
- include vs. import
- Re: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
Saturday, 19 February 2000
Friday, 18 February 2000
- Re: Equivalence classes
- Re: WG shifting gears (was Re: Constructs needed for Schema "compilation")
- Tag Names
- Re: Equivalence classes
- Re: Equivalence classes
- WG shifting gears (was Re: Constructs needed for Schema "compilation")
- Re: Sequences
- Re: group-declaration
Thursday, 17 February 2000
Wednesday, 16 February 2000
- Re: Deriving type definition by restriction
- Deriving type definition by restriction
- Sequences
- Re: Equivalence classes
- Numeric comparision benchmarks (C++)
Tuesday, 15 February 2000
Monday, 14 February 2000
- RE: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
- Re: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
- Re: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
- Re: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
Friday, 11 February 2000
- RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- Re: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
- RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
Thursday, 10 February 2000
- Re: Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
- please use titles, not addresses, as link text
- Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
Wednesday, 9 February 2000
- Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- RE: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- XML Schemas: Needs Marketing?
- Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
- Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
Tuesday, 8 February 2000
- Re: XML Schema Validating Parser
- Re: XML Schema Validating Parser
- XML Schema Validating Parser
- RE: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
- Re: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
- XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes
Monday, 7 February 2000
Sunday, 6 February 2000
Saturday, 5 February 2000
Friday, 4 February 2000
- Re: XML Schema syntax
- Re: 4.2.1 tags vs. elements
- 4.2.1 tags vs. elements
- Why are element and type needed both?
- Re: XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype?
Thursday, 3 February 2000
Wednesday, 2 February 2000
Tuesday, 1 February 2000
- XML Schema syntax
- what kind of grammars are XML,DTD and XSL files
- eXtensible Interchange Language (was [Re: XML Interoperability] )
- In Search of XML Interoperability: XLink + XML Schema = Interoperability?
- Re: XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype?
Monday, 31 January 2000
- Support for multiple schema for one namespace
- Re: XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype?
Sunday, 30 January 2000
- two problems
- XML Schema Question: attributing an element with a datatype?
- Primitive Datatypes of XML Schema (boolean, float, double)
Thursday, 27 January 2000
Tuesday, 25 January 2000
- Re: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
- Re: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
Monday, 24 January 2000
- Re: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
- RE: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
Sunday, 23 January 2000
- Re: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
- RE: More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
- Re: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here?
- RE: Is <any> really enough for <any><body>?
Saturday, 22 January 2000
- Missing context on "Reject" post/Minor editorial
- Re: Is the concept of Element Equivalence Classes really needed?
- More tweaks on time related datatypes and minor editorial
Friday, 21 January 2000
Thursday, 20 January 2000
Wednesday, 19 January 2000
- Re: Is the concept of Element Equivalence Classes really needed?
- Is the concept of Element Equivalence Classes really needed?
- Re: XML Schema's - Error
- XML Schema's - Error
- Re: Reject W3C XML Schema: structures
- Re: Reject W3C XML Schema: structures
Monday, 17 January 2000
- Re: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
- RE: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
- Re: Occurrences of attribute groups
- Occurrences of attribute groups
- Re: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
Sunday, 16 January 2000
Saturday, 15 January 2000
Friday, 14 January 2000
- Re: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here?
- Re: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here?
- Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here?
Thursday, 13 January 2000
- Re: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
- Re: Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
Tuesday, 11 January 2000
- RE: Is <any> really enough for <any><body>?
- RE: Is <any> really enough for <any><body>?
- Re: ANN: Help file for 17 Dec XML Schema
- ANN: Help file for 17 Dec XML Schema
- Is <any> really enough for <any><body>?
- Date and time types
- Floating point proposal from left field... [long]
- Error in non-normative reference...
Monday, 10 January 2000
- Re: Q: Please clarify pattern constraint on date/time
- Simplification of equivClass functionality
- Is <any> really enough for <any><body>?
Friday, 7 January 2000
- RE: Requirement for attributes with schema scope
- Re: Requirement for attributes with schema scope
- RE: Requirement for attributes with schema scope
- Re: Requirement for attributes with schema scope
Thursday, 6 January 2000
- Requirement for attributes with schema scope
- Q: Please clarify pattern constraint on date/time
- PROPOSAL: type assignment based on tag name and presence/absense of attributes
- Re: Saying anything about anything: Comments on Harle & Fensel
- RE: XML Schema Datatype Questions
- Re: ANN: XML Schema Tutorial
- Re: XML Schema Datatype Questions
- ANN: XML Schema Tutorial
- RE: XML Schema Datatype Questions
- Re: XML Schema Datatype Questions
Wednesday, 5 January 2000
- Re: Confusion on "Complex Type Definition" example
- Confusion on "Complex Type Definition" example
- Re: problem in example
Tuesday, 4 January 2000
Wednesday, 5 January 2000
Tuesday, 4 January 2000
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- ANN: XML Schema Regular Expression Parser
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema
- Re: Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema
- Round 2: How an XML instance document references an XML Schema
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
Monday, 3 January 2000
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- Re: XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet
- XML Schemas and the Enumeration Facet
- Comments on 12/17 Schema Datatypes
- Re: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- RE: locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- locally scoped element decls and namespaces
- Re: Specifying scope of uniqueness in XML Schemas?
- Specifying scope of uniqueness in XML Schemas?