www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from April to June 2000 by date

Friday, 30 June 2000

• Issue LC-177 (Tighten conformance rules?) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Decimal markers Martin Bryan

Thursday, 29 June 2000

• XML Schema issue LC-204 (was: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (2nd part)) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: NMTOKEN elements? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• RE: NMTOKEN elements? DuCharme, Robert
• Re: NMTOKEN elements? Henry S. Thompson
• RE: NMTOKEN elements? DuCharme, Robert
• RE: NMTOKEN elements? Biron,Paul V

Wednesday, 28 June 2000

• Re: suggestion to equivClass Nik Klever
• Re: suggestion to equivClass Henry S. Thompson
• suggestion to equivClass Nik Klever

Monday, 26 June 2000

• Fwd: Excerpt from I18N f2f minutes on XML Schema Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 24 June 2000

• Re: Processing instructions and/or comments in elements with simpleTy pe content Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 23 June 2000

• Whitespace normalisation (was Re: NMTOKEN elements?) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: NMTOKEN elements? petsa@us.ibm.com
• NMTOKEN elements? DuCharme, Robert

Thursday, 22 June 2000

• Re: LC-56: schemaPrefix Henry S. Thompson
• Re: What about no deterministic aspect? Henry S. Thompson
• Good News from College Broadcast! GoodNews
• What about no deterministic aspect? cedric thienot
• your imaging supplies bmark1@atlantaoffice.com

Wednesday, 21 June 2000

• LC-136: symbolic constants Arnold, Curt
• LC-56: schemaPrefix Arnold, Curt

Tuesday, 20 June 2000

• Processing instructions and/or comments in elements with simpleTy pe content Arnold, Curt

Wednesday, 21 June 2000

• Re: Attribute declarations after complex type definitions Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Attribute declarations after complex type definitions C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Tuesday, 20 June 2000

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
• Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Monday, 19 June 2000

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions Dan Connolly
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions muraw3c@attglobal.net
• Re: Schema Validation Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 18 June 2000

• Schema Validation Lindsey McNerney

Saturday, 17 June 2000

• Re: public version of the XML Schema Last Call issues list C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• public version of the XML Schema Last Call issues list C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Friday, 16 June 2000

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions Dan Connolly
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions MURATA Makoto
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions Murray Altheim
• Re: Note on DTD-related questions Dan Connolly

Thursday, 15 June 2000

• FW: Response to XML Last Call comment 83 "Better support for Sema ntic s" Barnette, Jim
• Re: xsd:appinfo Biron,Paul V

Wednesday, 14 June 2000

• Re: Note on DTD-related questions Murray Altheim
• RE: Normative DTD [was: Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3] Biron,Paul V
• Re: Entities Priscilla Walmsley
• Re: XML Schema and parser Henry S. Thompson

Tuesday, 13 June 2000

• RE: [comment] Mixed Content Model nchen
• Response to XML Last Call comment 83 "Better support for Semantic s" Barnette, Jim
• XML Schema and parser William FERRERES

Monday, 12 June 2000

• Normative DTD [was: Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3] David Beech
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Dan Connolly
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Dan Connolly
• RE: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Falk, Alexander
• Re[2]: XML Schema Structures Ivan Kurmanov

Saturday, 10 June 2000

• Re: (Clarification on xsi:type) was Re: Simplifying XML Schema Henry S. Thompson
• Re: XML Schema Structures Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Friday, 9 June 2000

• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) David Beech
• Re: Questio on Prefix before parameter Henry S. Thompson
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Questio on Prefix before parameter gmacri@libero.it
• LC-98. ns-and-schemaloc: Clarifying schema location and namespace David Ezell
• (Clarification on xsi:type) was Re: Simplifying XML Schema Rick JELLIFFE
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 8 June 2000

• RE: [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] regular expressions Biron,Paul V
• LC-82 XML Schema considered inadequately extensible Jonathan Robie
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler

Wednesday, 7 June 2000

• Re: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic David Beech
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema David Beech

Thursday, 8 June 2000

• [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] sequences Henry S. Thompson
• [Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>] [Moderator Action] regular expressions Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 7 June 2000

• Re: Inconsistency between equivClass and key ? Henry S. Thompson
• Inconsistency between equivClass and key ? cedric thienot
• Re: [Mark Benvenuto <t-markbe@microsoft.com>] Structures Spec Comments / XSV Error Henry S. Thompson
• [Mark Benvenuto <t-markbe@microsoft.com>] Structures Spec Comments / XSV Error Henry S. Thompson

Tuesday, 6 June 2000

• Re: mistake in example Henry S. Thompson
• mistake in example Volker Renneberg

Monday, 5 June 2000

• XML Schema Structures Ivan Kurmanov
• Re: constructing complex types Henry S. Thompson
• Re: constructing complex types petsa@us.ibm.com
• minor errors in part 0: primer David Valera
• Re: extension vs restriction Henry S. Thompson

Saturday, 3 June 2000

• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Schema Lewinsohn

Friday, 2 June 2000

• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (3rd part) Philip Wadler
• Cotton on Collation Jonathan Robie
• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Arnold, Curt
• Re: Positional data Henry S. Thompson
• Positional data Mabry, F. DR EECS
• Re: Root element/ association of a schema targetNamespaceof to an instance/ maxOccurs. Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Dates, time, positional data; conformance; and minor edits. Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Question on Equivalence Classes Henry S. Thompson
• Fwd: Re: comments on XML Schema part 2: Precision/Scale Jim Trezzo
• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Martin J. Duerst

Thursday, 1 June 2000

• RE: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Arnold, Curt
• Your issue wrt URIs for datatypes and facets Henry S. Thompson
• Root element/ association of a schema targetNamespaceof to an instance/ maxOccurs. S_PERROTT
• FW: More I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 0 Misha Wolf
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Rick JELLIFFE
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Martin J. Duerst
• Re: Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Martin J. Duerst

Wednesday, 31 May 2000

• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Biron,Paul V
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Arnold, Curt
• Dates, time, positional data; conformance; and minor edits. Mabry, F. DR EECS
• http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-2-20000407/datatypes.html Mabry, F. DR EECS
• Question on Equivalence Classes gmacri@libero.it
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 1 Martin J. Duerst
• Fwd: I18N Last call comments on Schema Part 2 Martin J. Duerst
• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic Martin J. Duerst
• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic Susan Lesch

Tuesday, 30 May 2000

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler
• RE: 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic Andrew Layman
• XML Linking WG comments on XML Schema Last Call specifications Eve L. Maler
• Identifying obsolete features Martin J. Duerst
• Extensibility Martin J. Duerst
• No identifiers with spaces or hyphens Martin J. Duerst
• Misc. comments on XML Schema part 2 Martin J. Duerst
• Order and desity of presentation in Part 2 Martin J. Duerst
• XML Schema for lightweight clients? Martin J. Duerst

Monday, 29 May 2000

• WEB MARKETING SOLUTIONS IIAC.NET
• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (2nd part) Paul Cotton
• Part 2: Precision/scale Martin J. Duerst
• These specs need some graphics Martin J. Duerst
• Part 2: Precision/scale Martin J. Duerst
• 'obtain' in the sense of 'succeed' is archaic Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 27 May 2000

• Fwd: XMLSchema Charles Campbell

Friday, 26 May 2000

• XML Schema Structure Philip Wadler
• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• extension vs restriction richard torres
• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction Joey Coyle
• Re: [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction Henry S. Thompson
• [Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>] restriction Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Martin J. Duerst
• Re: DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call David Beech

Thursday, 25 May 2000

• RE: Easier way to define enumerations Biron,Paul V
• Comments on the XML Schema Specification Mick Goulish
• Instance-parameterised constraints Peter van de Hoef
• DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• DOM WG comments on the schema Last Call Lauren Wood
• RE: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in t he XForms Data Model Ray Waldin
• Re: 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Questions on "Block" and namespace Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 24 May 2000

• Re: Question on namespace and schemalocation Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Thursday, 25 May 2000

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema (mixed content?) Peter Fankhauser
• RE: XML Schema Question: default namespace misses attributes Rajesh Kumar

Wednesday, 24 May 2000

• Open Content Model like in XDR schema achille@us.ibm.com
• RE: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model Asir S Vedamuthu
• Re: [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model petsa@us.ibm.com
• [Clarification]: Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model Asir S Vedamuthu
• Analysis of using XML Schemas Datatypes in the XForms Data Model Ray Waldin
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: Easier way to define enumerations petsa@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 23 May 2000

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler
• RE: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) Matthew Fuchs

Monday, 22 May 2000

• re: Multi-field key Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Last Call comments from the XForms Working group Micah Dubinko
• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas Henry S. Thompson

Sunday, 21 May 2000

• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas Martin Gudgin
• Attribute declarations after complex type definitions Martin J. Duerst
• Easier way to define enumerations Martin J. Duerst
• Some last-call comments Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 20 May 2000

• XML schema -- numeric values Graham Klyne
• Re: Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas Martin Gudgin

Friday, 19 May 2000

• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) David Beech
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) Matthew Fuchs
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) David Beech
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• missing use case? Francis Norton
• Attribute remapping support in XML Schemas Daniel Veillard
• Re: [Moderator Action] problem with validating against multiple, independent schemas Steve Monk
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Matthew Fuchs

Thursday, 18 May 2000

• Core WG comments on XML Schema wrt Infoset Paula Angerstein
• Re: Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler
• Re: [Moderator Action] problem with validating against multiple, independent schemas Henry S. Thompson
• XML Query Comments to XML Schema (1st part) Jerome Simeon
• Re: general schema and subschema's Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 17 May 2000

• Re: dynamic element name specification. C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: Named type definitions inside element declarations? Henry S. Thompson
• Named type definitions inside element declarations? Peter Canning

Tuesday, 16 May 2000

• Re: Simplifying XML Schema petsa@us.ibm.com
• RE: note from Aram Arapetian petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful David Beech
• Re: null and keyref Henry S. Thompson
• Oracle comments on recurringDuration petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: null and keyref petsa@us.ibm.com
• (no subject) petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL Dan Connolly

Monday, 15 May 2000

• RE: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL Cohen, Aaron M

Sunday, 14 May 2000

• Re: Question on "ref" attribute Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Datatypes comments Martin Bryan
• Question on "ref" attribute gmacri@libero.it
• RE: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) Martin J. Duerst

Saturday, 13 May 2000

• great web hosting deals 5pcSOZs8e@a-bcomputers.co.uk
• Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets Henry S. Thompson
• X3D-related comments on Schema datatypes Don Brutzman

Friday, 12 May 2000

• Simplifying XML Schema Philip Wadler
• Oracle Comments on XML Schema Last Call: Jim Trezzo
• Re: [comment] Mixed Content Model Dan Connolly
• Re: XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL Dan Connolly
• [comment] Mixed Content Model nchen
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Comment on XML Schema Working Draft Steven Goldfarb
• 'form' and 'elementFormDefault' appear harmful Ralph R. Swick
• [RESEND] Re: Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets Perry A. Caro
• Please make well-known URIs for all built-in datatypes and facets Ralph R. Swick
• RE: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) John Boyer
• Comment on last call of Schema doc Dan Rupe
• Re: Datatypes comments petsa@us.ibm.com
• XML Schema Comments Roger L. Costello
• minor typos in WD-xmlschema-2-20000407 Susan Lesch
• Lee Buck's use case returns: a hesitant proposal for type modification Henry S. Thompson
• Error logging in the infoset Henry S. Thompson
• Content model of <complexType> Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) Martin J. Duerst
• MIS Managers? David RR Webber
• MPEG-7 Feedback to Last Call for Review Jane Hunter

Thursday, 11 May 2000

• Inconsistency on content model for group Arnold, Curt
• xsd:appinfo Ralph R. Swick
• Element names should be xml:ids in schemas Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: [Clarifications] Part 2 Datatypes nchen
• Re: Question on include Henry S. Thompson
• Question on include gmacri@libero.it
• Re: Resolution of QNames references Henry S. Thompson
• Re: minor comments for WD-xmlschema-1-20000407 Henry S. Thompson
• Make it easy to create signable schemas (was: Re: XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema) Martin J. Duerst
• Comments on Section 6.3/(Locating Schema resources) Curt Arnold
• Resolution of QNames references Curt Arnold
• Minor part 1 comments Curt Arnold
• minor comments for WD-xmlschema-1-20000407 Susan Lesch

Wednesday, 10 May 2000

• Unique Particle Attribution with Choice groups that contain Sequence Groups rschloss@us.ibm.com
• Reagle's comments on XML Schema Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• [Michael Anderson <michael@research.canon.com.au>] Restricting Facets Henry S. Thompson
• Suggestion: Microparsing support in XML Schema (long) Anders W. Tell

Tuesday, 9 May 2000

• Help on wildcard achille@us.ibm.com
• Re: Help with Groups C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• Re: BC Dates C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Monday, 8 May 2000

• Suggested rewording in'3.8 Particle Details' Smith, Michael K
• Re: Question on XPath expression Henry S. Thompson
• Question on XPath expression gmacri@libero.it
• Re: Question on namespace and schemalocation Henry S. Thompson

Saturday, 6 May 2000

• Question on namespace and schemalocation gmacri@libero.it

Friday, 5 May 2000

• Integer and Nonegative Integer Doug Ransom
• Re: HTML WG last call remark (no way to declare entities?) Dan Connolly
• equivClass: common ancestor type Curt Arnold
• Re: Use of xml:lang Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 4 May 2000

• Use of xml:lang Jane Hunter
• Final schema draft kbagepalli@informatica.com
• [Help Me Understand] Part 1 Structures, Section 5.11 Complex Type Definition Constraints - Type Derivation OK Asir S Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 3 May 2000

• RE: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints Rick JELLIFFE
• Re: Disjoint datatypes? petsa@us.ibm.com
• Disjoint datatypes? Vun Kannon, David
• RE: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints Vun Kannon, David
• dynamic element name specification. Dr. Ardeshir Bahreininejad
• Re: Comments on Part 0: Primer Curt Arnold
• HTML WG last call remark Steven Pemberton
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Questions about optional and abset Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Comments on Part 0: Primer Henry S. Thompson
• Re: 4.3.1: second scenario: should value constraint default to FIXED? Henry S. Thompson
• Comments on Part 0: Primer Curt Arnold
• Questions about optional and abset Peter Canning
• 4.3.1: second scenario: should value constraint default to FIXED? James Tauber

Tuesday, 2 May 2000

• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• General Comments on Schema Specifications Miller, Robert (GXS)
• Questions about Schema and DTD in parts 1 and 2 Dan Vint
• Problems in Datatypes pt 2 (A Schema for Datatype Definitions (no rmative)) #2 Dan Vint
• Problems in Datatypes pt 2 (A Schema for Datatype Definitions (no rmative)) Dan Vint
• Re: Possible schema validation issue in 3.0b3 Henry S. Thompson
• Namespace of has-facet, has-property Curt Arnold

Monday, 1 May 2000

• Re: Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints Henry S. Thompson
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Henry S. Thompson
• Using appinfo annotations to store integrity constraints Vun Kannon, David
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• [www-xml-schema-comments] <none> Bill Lewis
• Re: Questions on "Block" and namespace Henry S. Thompson
• Questions on "Block" and namespace gmacri@libero.it
• XML Schema compiler/New Issue: name for the urType Curt Arnold

Saturday, 29 April 2000

• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Dan Connolly
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Dan Connolly

Friday, 28 April 2000

• New Issue: name for the urType Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Dan Connolly
• Re: XML Schema working with DTDs? Henry S. Thompson
• 4.3.1: representation of {target namespace} in second case has pa rent instead of ancestor James Tauber
• 3.2 / 4.3.1: {value contraint} in top-level attribute declaration s James Tauber
• RE: 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? James Tauber
• Re: 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: 4.3.3: should "anyAttribute" have a "processContents" attribute? Henry S. Thompson
• 4.3.7: can ##local stand alone in namespace attribute or must it be in a list? James Tauber
• 4.3.3: should "anyAttribute" have a "processContents" attribute? James Tauber
• RE: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur- Type ? James Tauber
• Re: 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? Henry S. Thompson
• 3.4/3.13: should there be a Simply Type Definition of the Ur-Type ? James Tauber
• Re: 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type Henry S. Thompson
• 3.4: why does absent point to definition for null in glossary? James Tauber
• 3.4: {name} of the Ur-Type James Tauber
• Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration? Henry S. Thompson
• RE: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Declaration? James Tauber
• Re: 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration? Henry S. Thompson
• 3.2: why are {min occurs}/{max occurs} optional in Attribute Decl aration? James Tauber

Thursday, 27 April 2000

• Entities dejudicibus@it.ibm.com
• Re: Few comments dejudicibus@it.ibm.com
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes Curt Arnold
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 26 April 2000

• Content models that are not regular expressions Richard Tobin
• Few comments Curt Arnold
• Re: SimpleTypes derived by restriction Curt Arnold
• Re: SimpleTypes derived by restriction Ray Waldin
• SimpleTypes derived by restriction Ray Waldin

Tuesday, 25 April 2000

• Few comments and two proposals about the latest draft (2000-04-07) Dario de Judicibus

Friday, 21 April 2000

• imports, includes and namespace prefixes Curt Arnold
• Re: ANN: XML Schema Compilation Project on SourceForge Rick JELLIFFE
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes Curt Arnold
• Re: Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes Henry S. Thompson
• Proper home namespace/resource for built-in datatypes Curt Arnold

Thursday, 20 April 2000

• ANN: XML Schema Compilation Project on SourceForge Arnold, Curt
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Box, Don
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 19 April 2000

• ANN: HTMLHelp file for 7 April XML Schema Arnold, Curt
• question XML-EDI Marc Wilkson

Tuesday, 18 April 2000

• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Arnold, Curt
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Box, Don
• nonPositiveInteger petsa@us.ibm.com
• RE: Schema for XSLT (concerns mixed content, content attribute) Arnold, Curt
• Shipper/biller vs. Shippee/billee in part 0 Ray_Gates@manulife.com
• Possible error in Part 0 - report.xsd Ray_Gates@manulife.com
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas Yuichi Koike
• Re: XPath built-in datatype Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Initial issues with schema for schemas Curt Arnold

Monday, 17 April 2000

• typo in example GRMEYER@de.ibm.com
• Default values vs. validation Mikael Ståldal
• AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More hifiber7@pplmail.com

Friday, 14 April 2000

• Re: XML Schema Datatypes comments petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: Comments and questions on the last call XML Schema working draft petsa@us.ibm.com
• Re: Questions relating to data types petsa@us.ibm.com
• Questions gmacri@libero.it
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Martin Bryan

Thursday, 13 April 2000

• Re: P3P and XML Schemas Yuichi Koike
• Re: P3P and XML Schemas Yuichi Koike
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Martin Bryan
• Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Martin Bryan
• Questions relating to data types Martin Bryan
• Re: Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Henry S. Thompson
• Using derivedBy to define lists of permitted attribute values Martin Bryan

Wednesday, 12 April 2000

• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. David RR Webber
• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. Bruce Peat
• Typos in Primer Section 3.1 Adrian Robert
• Part2.xsd will not display in IE5 Arnold, Curt
• Re: Datatypes: minor typographical issues Henry S. Thompson
• Datatypes: minor typographical issues Arnold, Curt
• xsi:null and keyref Henry S. Thompson
• blockDefault in Section 4.7 of XML Schema Part 0 : Primer Peter A. Berggren
• Re: Comments on regular expressions Falk, Alexander
• Re: maxOccurs depends on minOccurs Henry S. Thompson

Tuesday, 11 April 2000

• maxOccurs depends on minOccurs Ace
• Re: Multi-field key Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Multi-field key Ani Pedersen
• Re: W3C Schema Work Machinations. David RR Webber

Monday, 10 April 2000

• La Noticia de Boleon-El traductor y los superdominios Equipo de Soporte

Tuesday, 11 April 2000

• Re: P3P and XML Schemas Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: User interface default values Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Monday, 10 April 2000

• Re: XML Schema Last Call working drafts released David Wang
• Comments and questions on the last call XML Schema working draft Falk, Alexander
• Comments on regular expressions TAMURA Kent

Sunday, 9 April 2000

• your imaging supplies bmark1@atlantaoffice.com

Friday, 7 April 2000

• Re: P3P and XML Schemas Henry S. Thompson
• P3P and XML Schemas Martin J. Duerst
• User interface default values Curt Arnold

Thursday, 6 April 2000

• XPath built-in datatype Arnold, Curt

Wednesday, 5 April 2000

• Re: Schema Information Set Contribution: Identity-constraint Table Henry S. Thompson

Tuesday, 4 April 2000

• Re: Problems with P3P XML schema Henry S. Thompson
• Problems with P3P XML schema Martin J. Duerst

Monday, 3 April 2000

• XML-Schema Requirements for SMIL Cohen, Aaron M
• laser printer toner advertisement bench@linuxmail.org
• validating parser for xml rajeshwari

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2000 15:02:41 UTC