- From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:10:28 -0700
- To: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, "'robin@isogen.com'" <robin@isogen.com>
>From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com> >To: "'Robin Cover'" <robin@isogen.com> >Cc: "'www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org> >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:36:06 -0600 >Subject: RE: reftype (IDREF constraints) >Robin Cover wrote: >>> So: are any of the new specs addressing the >>> matter of constraints upon referenced elements? >>> In current syntax, this would amount to saying >>> that IDREF(s) in a given case could only be >>> pointers to specified (classes of) GIs, as >>> approximately in the HyTime 'reftype'. >I don't know of any. The Schema WG has formed a small task force which is preparing a recommendation on how the Schema specs should address "better reference mechanisms" [1]. Among other things, they will be addressing scoped IDs (document-level, GI-level, archetype-level?, XPath-level?, etc.) as well as IDREFS (or other mechanisms) for referencing such scoped IDs. A summary of the task force's recommendation and technical discussion of that recommendation will take place on the Schema IG list [2]. pvb References [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/1999Jul/0131.html [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/1999/05/xml-schema-ig-charter.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 1999 12:12:56 UTC