- From: <petsa@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 10:02:21 -0400
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- cc: Www-Xml-Schema-Comments@w3.org, Xml-Dev <Xml-Dev@Ic.Ac.Uk>
- Message-ID: <8525676E.004D1DCC.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
I spoke to one of our developers and he thinks minOccurs, maxOccurs
is a bear to implement. I'd be glad to see it removed.
Regards, Ashok
(Embedded
image moved to Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
file: 05/10/99 05:19 PM
pic31710.pcx)
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, xml-dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
cc: (bcc: Ashok Malhotra/Watson/IBM)
Subject: minOccur, maxOccur
I dispute the usefulness of minOccur and maxOccur. I would like to hear
about where people would use these features. I find that people often want
them but can find a clearer way of expressing their document type when
they are not available.
--
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
And so, in one of history's little ironies, the global triumph of bad
software in the age of the PC was reversed by a surprising combination
of forces: the social transformation initiated by the network, a
long-discarded European theory of political economy, and a small band
of programmers throughout the world mobilized by a single simple idea.
- http://old.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: pic31710.pcx
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 1999 10:04:12 UTC