- From: <petsa@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 10:02:21 -0400
- To: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- cc: Www-Xml-Schema-Comments@w3.org, Xml-Dev <Xml-Dev@Ic.Ac.Uk>
- Message-ID: <8525676E.004D1DCC.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
I spoke to one of our developers and he thinks minOccurs, maxOccurs is a bear to implement. I'd be glad to see it removed. Regards, Ashok (Embedded image moved to Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> file: 05/10/99 05:19 PM pic31710.pcx) To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, xml-dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk> cc: (bcc: Ashok Malhotra/Watson/IBM) Subject: minOccur, maxOccur I dispute the usefulness of minOccur and maxOccur. I would like to hear about where people would use these features. I find that people often want them but can find a clearer way of expressing their document type when they are not available. -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco And so, in one of history's little ironies, the global triumph of bad software in the age of the PC was reversed by a surprising combination of forces: the social transformation initiated by the network, a long-discarded European theory of political economy, and a small band of programmers throughout the world mobilized by a single simple idea. - http://old.law.columbia.edu/my_pubs/anarchism.html
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: pic31710.pcx
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 1999 10:04:12 UTC