Yes, good point. Thanks! Regards, Ashok (Embedded image moved to dog <dog@dog.net.uk> file: 05/07/99 01:04 PM pic29110.pcx) To: paul.v.biron@kp.org, Ashok Malhotra/Watson/IBM@IBMUS cc: Subject: xml schema part 2: datatypes in http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2 you wrote: Issue (dateTime-lexical-representation): We need to spell out the various SQL and ISO 8601 representations (e.g., CCYYMMDD and CCYY-MM-DD, etc.) in detail here, or in a (non-normative) appendix. We may also want to support additional formats e.g. neither SQL or ISO 8601 seems to support the 12/25/1999 format for date. A lexical representation for dateTime as a collection of elements may also be desirable. This issue also applies to [date], [time] and [timePeriod]. note that such additional formats may be constrained by locale. for example, in europe we use DD/MM/YYYY format not MM/DD/YYYY format, making 01/03/1999 ambiguous (1 march 1999 or 3 january 1999) without locale-specific information. i'm sure you were already aware of that, like. dog
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:45 UTC