- From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 01:20:04 -0800
- To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5E1C82BD.7CB0AD27-ON88256E4D.003299E3-88256E4D.0033469F@us.ibm.com>
XMLP WG will formally consider whether to join with Schema's comment at its telcon next week (March 10). In the meantime, this email serves as the heads-up outlined by Noah below. David Fallside Chair, XMLP WG ----- Forwarded by David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM on 03/04/2004 01:12 AM ----- Noah Mendelsohn/Cambri dge/IBM@Lotus To Sent by: w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org w3c-xml-protocol- cc wg-request@w3.org Subject Report from Henry that Query WG 03/03/2004 01:09 Needs DM Input by Thursday AM I note the following from Henry. We agreed yesterday not to formally weigh in this until next week, but I wonder whether it would be appropriate for David as chair to at least give Query an immediate heads up that "There seems to be considerable sympathy in XMLP for supporting Query's view that the Data Model should be an Infoset++ with functional accessors if useful. We need until early next week to make that input formal, but my reading as chair is that it's at least 50/50 that you will get such input from us." I hear rumors that the DOM group is considering similar feedback. Here are links to pertinent notes on the Schema IQ list [1,2,3]. Noah [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0008.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0009.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Mar/0010.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- ----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM on 03/03/2004 04:02 AM ----- |---------+--------------------------------> | | ht@inf.ed.ac.uk | | | (Henry S. Thompson) | | | Sent by: | | | w3c-xml-schema-ig-req| | | uest@w3.org | | | | | | | | | 03/03/2004 03:31 AM | | | | |---------+--------------------------------> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: Schema Interest Group <w3c-xml-schema-ig@w3.org> | | cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) | | Subject: Re: Draft wording on feedback to QT on Data Model and Infoset | >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| QT have scheduled work on Data Model for this Friday morning -- accordingly it would help them if we sent our pending comment by close of business tomorrow (Thursday). So if anyone is not happy with what I sent, _please_ signal this ASAP, alternatively if you think it's OK to send it Thursday, please signal that also. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: pic04423.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2004 04:22:53 UTC