- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 14:20:27 +0000
- To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Hi, I think Issue-0064 should be renamed something like "Including type in element constructors" - it's a comment on the editorial note just after the element-complex-node constructor in Section 4.2 which says: "The constructor only takes the element declaration, because it's possible to derive the type of an element or attribute from its corresponding declaration. But would it be cleaner to include the type in the constructor as well?" Issue-0064 is a "yes" to that question, because the type of an element is not always the same as the type of the element declaration - if it has an xsi:type attribute, the type named there is the type of the element. The same applies to the element-simple-node constructor. It doesn't apply to attributes, since attributes can't have xsi:type attributes, obviously, but it might be worth making the change for the attribute node constructors for the sake of consistency. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2002 09:22:31 UTC