- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 06:21:24 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
- Cc: Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk
At 12:01 PM 10/11/2001 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >I *still* see no response to > > From: Libby Miller (Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk) > Date: Tue, Jun 12 2001 > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-query-comments/2001Jun/0007.html > >Please explain what's up. And please copy the public >www-xml-query-comments list when you do. The Working Group does not have an official position on querying RDF with XQuery. This is a topic that interests me, and I believe that the following paper shows that both RDF and Topic Maps, once normalized, can be queried with XQuery in a fairly straightforward manner: http://www.idealliance.org/papers/xml2001/papers/html/03-01-04.html The RDF syntax used in this paper could be improved, and I think that the query library could be improved in the area of preserving RDF type information in the results, but I think this paper shows that making XML and RDF play nicely together is both desirable and feasible. I rather like the summary this got in XML Hack: http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1492 Hope this helps! Jonathan These are my opinions right now. They may be quite different from the opinions of Software AG, the W3C XML Query Working Group, or the opinions that I will have after reading and considering your response.
Received on Saturday, 12 January 2002 06:21:45 UTC