- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 07:34:04 -0500
- To: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org, massimo@w3.org
At 12:34 PM 1/7/2002 +0100, Max Froumentin wrote: >CC'ing Massimo Marchiori, maintainer of www-xml-query-comments > > >You wrote: > > > The www-xml-query-comments archive is full of junk which makes it hard > > to see if anyone else is making similar comments before posting new > > comments on the drafts. > >That's an easy fix for Massimo. > > > Actually, as I've previously commented on xsl-list, it would be best if > > all the xquery/xpath/xslt drafts had a single, moderated, list for > > official comments. Due to the interlinked nature of the drafts > > having three comment lists makes it really makes it difficult to know > > how to respond to many issues if they affect more than one draft. > >Find me a name for the list and I'll have it created ;-) Any name containing the names of both languages would do, eg www-xpath-xquery-comments@w3.org. Since XPath and XQuery are largely the same language, I agree that it would be good to have a single list for feedback to both specifications, but only if it replaces the individual comments lists. If we have to monitor this list plus a new one, I don't think we've gained anything. XSLT is a different language, and seems to warrant its own comments list. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 7 January 2002 07:34:26 UTC