- From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 06:26:47 -0800
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com> To: <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: RE: [xml-dev] The use of XML syntax in XML Query > > Strong typing - There is a real-world use case for ensuring that queries > return schema-valid results, for example ensuring that they can be displayed > in valid XHTML. (Whether anyone outside the W3C cares about schema-valid > XHTML is another matter, but it is a "real world" example that I'm sure has > counterparts with more data-oriented schemas in the REAL real world). Doing > this is a hard, but solveable problem, and solving it requires that XPath > 2.0 and XQuery be designed as a unit, even if they are layered once > everything is done. Thus, "declaring victory" on XPath 2.0 without solving > this problem is essentially declaring defeat on some matters near and dear > to XQuery, since it is very unlikely that they could be solved in XQuery > without changing XPath. > I'm still waiting for someone with a theoretical background to debunk the statements in the paper "On Database Theory and XML"[0] that it is is an unsolvable problem to guarantee that one can create a query that for any given XML input will generate output that conforms to a specified XML schema. [0] http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/suciu/files/_F2066943700.ps -- THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #35 I will not grow a goatee. In the old days they made you look diabolic. Now they just make you look like a disaffected member of Generation X. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 18:27:47 UTC