- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:37:13 -0700
- To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@softwareag.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:43 PM > To: Champion, Mike; www-xml-query-comments@w3.org; > xml-dev@lists.xml.org > Subject: RE: [xml-dev] The use of XML syntax in XML Query > > Do you really want the XQuery standard to be released two years after Microsoft's > implementation hits the market? Since Software AG is implementing XQuery, > don't we want to be implementing something that conforms to an existing standard? I want standards to be based on real-world experience, and for companies to support standards when they deserve the name. Also, recall that I think that XPath 2.0 is ultra high priority for the W3C, the vendors, and is what the users are clamoring for. It's the additional features that XQuery adds, especially strong typing and constructors, that are generating the pushback on this list. > The XQuery WG was chartered in 1999. It really does need to > be able to complete a 1.0 specification at some point. Tim Bray had a memorable quote that I've forgotten <grin>, something to the effect that the hardest thing for a WG to learn is when to declare victory. XPath 2.0 is a VICTORY!! Proclaim it to the world! It hits the 80:20 point in the XQuery requirements! Ship it! XQuery can solve the rest of the world's problems in the fullness of time. > What exactly are you asking us to get right? You're getting lots of pushback on a few of the more advanced features of the XQuery specs, and the rather complex relationship between XSLT and XQuery. I have no particular opinion on the issues being pushed back, but I think they deserve more thorough consideration than "we can't think about alternatives because we gotta ship". I'm suggesting you decouple the components, ship what is solid (XPath 2.0, IMHO) and sort out the harder stuff on its own schedule. You folks are producing a fine meal, don't serve all the dishes at once! If XPath 2.0 comes out soon, the world will give you a year or two while it digests that course before clamoring for the next. Especially since the world is still digesting W3C XSD, now would be a bad time to serve the dishes that build on the XSD types and PSVI. Declare victory, one dish at a time, and the XML world will savor your creation. Put it all in front of us at once, and there's gonna be a food fight. <sorry!>
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 14:37:53 UTC