- From: james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:16:21 +0200
- To: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org, MichaelDyck@home.com
my reading of the new spec left me in a similar quandry. the earlier version permitted a context free lexical analysis. that was nice. the newer one precludes that. at first i wondered why one would make such a qualitative chage without a mention, but then i reflected on the general tendancy away from the original syntax, which had adopted many nice, simple, clear, easy to read features from the algebra syntax, towards a syntax which offers the convenience of literal xml forms. this realization made every thing clear. so just resigned myself to incorporating a context-dependent lexical analyser of the same order as a full-blown xml-parser requires. in my case, the parser itself permits multiple categories, so it's not too bad. who am i to say... > From: Michael Dyck (MichaelDyck@home.com) > Date: Sun, Jun 17 2001 > ... > > What is a would-be tokenizer to do? It seems that lexical analysis of XQuery > requires contextual feedback from the parser, which must be running in > parallel. This is an unwelcome complication, and one that is not supported > by all parsing software. > > -Michael Dyck
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 06:12:32 UTC