- From: Mary F. Fernandez <mff@research.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:05 -0500
- To: jjc@jclark.com
- Cc: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Hi James, Thanks for pointing this out. The general issue is that the Algebra's type system lets you construct values whose types are more general than those permitted by XML Schema. [Issue-0018: Align algebra types with schema] I'll note this in teh current issue. Thanks, Mary > AnyComplexType > > From: James Clark (jjc@jclark.com) > Date: Tue, Dec 12 2000 > > *Next message: Fairdeal: "BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY IN INDIA" > > * Previous message: francois.xavier.bodin@winealley.com: "Meet us on Wine Alley" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Message-ID: <3A36021E.92E7C434@jclark.com> > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:46:54 +0700 > From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> > To: XML Query Comments <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org> > Subject: AnyComplexType > > The definition of AnyComplexType doesn't match the concrete syntax for > types since it applies unbounded repetition to AnyTree and one > alternative for AnyTree is AnyAttribute. > > James > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * Next message: Fairdeal: "BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY IN INDIA" > * Previous message: francois.xavier.bodin@winealley.com: "Meet us on Wine Alley" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] -- Mary Fernandez AT&T Labs - Research Principal Technical Staff Member 180 Park Ave., Bldg 103, E243 mff@research.att.com Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971 http://www.research.att.com/~mff 973-360-8679 FAX: 973-360-8187
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 09:35:11 UTC