- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:28:28 -0400
- To: www-xml-packaging@w3.org
I suspect most of the folks who will be in this discussion will have at least heard of XPDL, but if anyone hasn't, it might be worth a look: http://purl.oclc.org/NET/xpdl In short: XML Processing Description Language (XPDL) simplifies the management of document sets and makes document processing more reliable. By creating descriptions for classes of documents, rather than relying on documents to link to processing descriptions themselves, XPDL makes it possible to move beyond the monolithic model presented by DTDs today and to add new resources, like schemas, style sheets, and processing information to the concept of a document class. I began the work before 'packaging' was the common term for such work, but it fits a similar category. It was originally planned to use XLink and RDF, but given the delays in XLink and the complexity of RDF, neither of those really happened. I don't expect this work to be accepted in its present form, but I hope it at least illustrates some of the problems to which packaging might be a solution. Also possibly worth looking at is a presentation I gave last month: XML's Interoperability Problems: Not as easy as it seems - http://www.simonstl.com/articles/interop/ Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2000 14:25:42 UTC