- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:42:16 -0400
- To: Brett Zamir <brettz9@yahoo.com>
- CC: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:42:57 UTC
Brett, Thank you for taking the time to review XLink 1.1 and provide constructive suggestions for how it might be improved. However, in an effort to move the XLink revision forward quickly (Ha!), the Working Group chose an extremely narrow scope for the changes in XLink 1.1: http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink10-ext/ In effect, only two significant technical changes are in-scope for XLink 1.1, making the xlink:type attribute an application-level default and making XLink href attributes IRIs. Please accept my appologies if this narrow scope is a disappointment. If XLink 1.1 inspires greater adoption, we might someday revisit XLink for more substantive technical changes. At such time, we'd be happy to consider your suggestions. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There are things which don't deserve to http://nwalsh.com/ | be said briefly.--Jean Rostand
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 13:42:57 UTC