- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:53:40 +0100 (BST)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: <public-iri@w3.org>, <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> You should simply drop this effort and use IRI References instead. There > is a high cost associated with yet another notion of resource identifier > technology This is not another notion of resource identifier. It is the existing notion used for XML system identifier, XLink href, and several other things. We are merely providing a name and a single place for a definition that already exists in multiple specs. > Simply prohibit anything but IRI references and, > if necessary, specify "utf-8-percent-escape all disallowed characters" > as error recovery method. That would constitute a normative change to several specs. -- Richard
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 15:53:51 UTC