Re: Fwd: Re: HRRIs, IRIs, etc

/ Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> was heard to say:
| Dear IRI and XML experts,
[...]
| - The IRI spec excludes private use characters from all but the query part.

We have attempted to address this concern[1] by adding

  * characters in the Unicode private use area (#xE000-#xF8FF), except
    where they appear in the query part of the resulting IRI.

to the list.

|   (there are other smaller differences, but for the moment, this is enough)

Could you, please, provide a more exhaustive account of the
differences which concern you? The Core WG thinks it would be most
efficient if we could consider as many of them as possible at the same
time.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 17:24:55 UTC