- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:27:58 +0000
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anne van Kesteren writes:
> I read that the XML Core WG is planning to advance XLink 1.1 to CR. I
> wonder why the WG never responded to
> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s41fiw0b64w2qv@id-c0020.lan for example.
The Disposition of Comments [1] notes this and some other issues as
being closed, but with *dissent* from the commentor. The Director
will consider these dissents as part of his decision on whether to
advance XLink 1.1 to CR or not.
> The WG might also want to mention
> http://www.w3.org/mid/4210DA39.5080702@annevankesteren.nl in its
> transition request explicitly because they claim certain comments
> are not being satisfied because that would go outside the scope of
> the requirements document...
The WG certainly read that email, and I at least found it helpful, but
I'm not sure how it bears on the question of what is or isn't in
scope.
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xlink11/lc-status/doc.html
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEHoOukjnJixAXWBoRAk88AJwNy1FO4NYR0EuumdxlB+dONeQWaACdHNN3
WvIl4VQydLhp5Tcwo93nnFY=
=7POC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 11:06:18 UTC