[closed] Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1

/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
| * Norman Walsh wrote:
|>/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
|>| Dear XML Core Working Group,
|>|
|>|   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ is unclear about use of
|>| XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 documents. For example, section 5.7 notes "The
|>| value of a label, from, or to attribute must be an NCName." where NCName
|>| is defined in Namespaces in XML 1.0, it is unclear whether the same re-
|>| quirement applies to XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 documents, please change the
|>| draft such that the relationship between XLink 1.1 and XML 1.1 is clear.
|>
|>We'll update the draft to make it clear that XLink works for both XML 1.0
|>and XML 1.1 and that the names should match the version of XML being used
|>(e.g., labels in an XML 1.0 document must be XML 1.0 NCNames and labels
|>in an XML 1.1 document must be XML 1.1 NCNames).
|
| I note that this is inconsistent with the approach other working groups
| take regarding such matters, some restrict the language to allow only
| the use of XML 1.0-defined names, others allow XML 1.1-defined names
| regardless of the version, but so long as this is well-defined, I guess
| I can accept this. Thanks.

Thank you.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.