- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:24:39 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:39:02 +0100, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> wrote: > | Currently it is undefined for example what UAs should do when the > elements > | mentioned in section 4.2 are not direct children but descendants. > Should the UA > | do all that is possible to show information to the user or must it > only check > | the children? > > Section 4.2 seems clear. It lists the parent/child relationships that are > significant and states that other combinations are not conformant. Non conformant and error handling are quite distinct topics. Did the WG perhaps misunderstood the comment? > | I suggest that the specification gets a normative error handling > section. > > Please see the thread that begins at 0013. I don't see how <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2006JanMar/0013> (or any of the subsequent e-mails) relates to my issue. Note that this was an example. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 23:24:52 UTC